The adversarial procedure is the only rule to guarantee, and article 40 of the French Code of Criminal Procedure

2018-01-03
2 min read
Featured Image Click on this link to visualize the original email: 2018-01-03_2310_0800-article-432-1-code-penal-et-corruption-passive-par-carrierisme_Redacted.pdf

From: Yves Strickler (French law professor)
Subject: Re: Article 432-1 of the French Criminal Code and passive corruption due to careerism
Date sent: January 03, 2018, 23:10 (China Standard Time)
To: Vincent B. Le Corre

Professor of Law Yves Strickler highlighted a fundamental principle to me: “It is essential to remember that the adversarial procedure is fundamentally the only rule to guarantee. It is only through this procedure that we can hope to see the truth come to light.”

Regarding my question about the existence of a law requiring officials to report any observed offense, he confirmed:

“Yes, for officials: Article 40, paragraph 2 of the French Code of Criminal Procedure:”

He then quoted the relevant article:

“The public prosecutor receives complaints and denunciations and assesses the actions to be taken in accordance with the provisions of Article 40-1.

Any established authority, public officer, or official who, in the exercise of their duties, becomes aware of a crime or misdemeanor is obliged to promptly inform the public prosecutor and transmit to this magistrate all information, reports, and documents related to it.”

Click on this link to visualize the original email: 2018-01-03_2310_0800-article-432-1-code-penal-et-corruption-passive-par-carrierisme_Redacted.pdf

To gain a clearer understanding of the sequence of events in this case, I invite you to view a detailed timeline at the following link:
https://www.ECTHRwatch.org/timeline/mcdonalds/
This timeline provides a comprehensive overview of the key milestones and developments.

Avatar

Vincent B. Le Corre

I am the key witness and whistleblower in the major criminal RICO case targeting McDonald’s Corporation and their accomplices for fraud, money laundering, and corruption of foreign officials and magistrates. Initially granted anonymity by the European Court of Human Rights (Rules 33 and 47 of the Rules of Court), I made the decision in August 2023 to temporarily go public with my identity. This decision, driven by concerns for my own safety and that of my loved ones, was taken despite the potential risks, hoping it will be temporary only and that I can return to anonymity soon.